Posts Tagged ‘Section 29 of the Education Act’

A real set back for Inclusion- Lucan Educate Together – a disgrace!

Sunday, January 30th, 2011

Lucan educate together

A DUBLIN school was entitled to refuse to enrol a boy in a class for children with autism, the High Court has ruled.

Mr Justice Daniel O’Keeffe yesterday upheld a challenge by Lucan Educate Together National School to a Department of Education appeals committee decision allowing an appeal by the child’s parents against the school’s refusal in late 2007 to enrol him in its outreach class for children with autism.

While it was accepted the class had capacity for the child, the school refused enrolment on grounds he did not meet the criterion for enrolment in light of a psychologist’s report stating he had “significant” learning disability and significant developmental delay.

The school’s criterion for enrolment included only a “mild” learning disability and the school said the services available to it could not meet the child’s needs.

The parents appealed under Section 29 of the Education Act and the appeals committee allowed that appeal and directed the child be enrolled in January 2008. The committee found the child met the “main criteria” for enrolment but the school then took judicial review proceedings.

Yesterday, Mr Justice O’Keeffe found in favour of the school.

While it was not unreasonable for the committee to describe autism as the main criterion for enrolment, and there was no issue that there was capacity in the outreach class for the child, other aspects of the committee’s decision were unreasonable and invalid, the judge found.

 

 

DisabiLity

The committee’s conclusion that the child had a mild learning disability was unreasonable, given the facts and evidence in the case, he ruled.

The judge said the report relied on by the committee at the appeal could not be read as establishing the child suffered from a mild learning disability.

The report referred to the child having “adaptive skills” within the “mild range of adaptive functioning” This was a different condition to a learning disability, he said.

Source Evening Herald

We at My Special Needs say Shame on You Lucan Educate Together! The effort you spent ( and the money! ) bringing this case to the high court should have been spent on resources within the school to facilitate the boy’s learning.

Copy of Letter to Mr Batt O Keefe T.D. Minister for Education and Science

Wednesday, September 9th, 2009

Mr  Batt O’Keefe T.D.

Minister for Education and Science

Office of the Minister for Education and Science

Marlborough Street

Dublin 1

September 9, 2009

 

 

Your Ref: 0904527 BC

 

 

Dear Mr O Keefe

 

 

Further to your letter of 2nd September 2009 – I am writing to clarify our situation.

 

In your letter you say that “Where a school refuses to enroll a pupil, the school is obliged to inform you as a parent, of your right under Section 29 of Education Act 1998 to appeal that decision to either the relevant Vocational Educational Committee or to the Secretary General of my Department”. St Michaels House Special Needs School, Hacketstown, Skerries,Co. Dublin did not do this. I enclose a copy of the correspondence received from them dated  1st May 2009 – and there is absolutely no mention of the appeal’s process and thus they have failed in their obligation to do this.

 

We will now appeal their decision.

 

I will keep you informed of progress in this process.

 

Thank you for your assistance in this regard.

 

Yours Faithfully

 

_______________

Tommy Boyle